<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The End of the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickdozier.com/blog/2008/the-end-of-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickdozier.com/blog/2008/the-end-of-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Nick Dozier's Personal Website and Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:59:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.nickdozier.com/blog/2008/the-end-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickdozier.com/blog/?p=30#comment-213</guid>
		<description>@Chris suck it indeed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris suck it indeed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.nickdozier.com/blog/2008/the-end-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickdozier.com/blog/?p=30#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Suck a fat one time warner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suck a fat one time warner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldangerous</title>
		<link>http://www.nickdozier.com/blog/2008/the-end-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldangerous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickdozier.com/blog/?p=30#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Cable internet and television providers are trying to thwart online content providers? No!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cable internet and television providers are trying to thwart online content providers? No!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.nickdozier.com/blog/2008/the-end-of-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickdozier.com/blog/?p=30#comment-204</guid>
		<description>What is even crazier to me is that the telecom (AT&amp;T, TW, and Comcastic) monopolies have somehow convinced the public to pay 3 times for bandwidth.  Last time I checked I have a cable bill, an Internet bill, and a cell phone bill.  I am pretty sure that after the initial connection point (fiber-optic, coax, cell towers, etc), all the services run over the same network using the same bandwidth.  That brings my actual bandwidth bill to $150+/month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is even crazier to me is that the telecom (AT&amp;T, TW, and Comcastic) monopolies have somehow convinced the public to pay 3 times for bandwidth.  Last time I checked I have a cable bill, an Internet bill, and a cell phone bill.  I am pretty sure that after the initial connection point (fiber-optic, coax, cell towers, etc), all the services run over the same network using the same bandwidth.  That brings my actual bandwidth bill to $150+/month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
